Browsed by
Tag: Heat Safety

Evaluation of Go Sun Smart Georgia

Evaluation of Go Sun Smart Georgia

The evaluation results of a workplace sun safety research project were presented at the 18th Annual Conference on the Science of Dissemination and Implementation in Health held December 14-17, 2025, in Washington, DC. Dr. Cam Escoffery from Emory University was the presenting author. The presentation complemented the conference theme of “Realizing the Benefits of Dissemination & Implementation Science.”

African American and Hispanic workers face unique skin cancer risks and are underrepresented in sun safety intervention research. To support sun safety practice in occupational settings with racially/ethnically heterogeneous populations, we adapted an evidence-based sun safety program—Go Sun Smart Georgia (GSSG)—to better serve African American and Hispanic outdoor workers and evaluated it in local governments. Program implementation outcomes are described.

The study enrolled seven local public employers in Georgia in 2024 and randomly assigned them to intervention (3 sites) or delayed intervention (comparison) group (4 sites), stratified by government type (municipal/county) and size (≥100/<100 employees). GSSG included training of peer coaches; written audit of the employers’ sun safety policies and practices; 45-minute online employee training; and a resource website. Program materials were adapted with culturally relevant language and imagery. GSSG was delivered over a four-month period in June-October. Implementation outcomes were collected via surveys and implementation logs: GSSG delivery, worksite sun safety policy adoption or modification, skin cancer and heat illness prevention practice use and penetration, and GSSG acceptability.

Two county governments and five municipalities (3 large, 2 small) in Southwest/East Georgia participated and 48 managers and 156 outdoor workers were assessed. Compared to the comparison group, outdoor workers in the intervention worksites had higher level of information about UV and heat protective behaviors; more workers recalled receiving skin cancer and heat training; and more reported sharing sun safety information from work at home. Uptake of GSSG policy components was slow; no sites requested a policy audit, one requested a model sun safety policy. Both managers and outdoor workers rated GSSG materials highly (an average of 4.29 out of 5 stars).

The adapted GSSG was well received and improved knowledge and sharing of sun safety practices among outdoor workers. Systematic adaptation of effective interventions for novel populations is important for increasing reach and impact of evidence in sun safety interventions and addressing disparities in cancer prevention.

This research was supported by a grant (U48DP006377) from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to the Emory University Prevention Research Center (Dr. Alex Morshed from Emory University and Dr. David Buller from Klein Buendel, Multiple Principal Investigators). Additional authors on the poster presentation included Mary Buller, Dr. Barbara Walkosz, and Irene Adjei from Klein Buendel; and Dr. Cam Escoffery, Helen Singer, April Hermstad, and Dr. Regine Haardörfer from Emory University. 

Analysis of Municipal Shade Policies

Analysis of Municipal Shade Policies

Shade is an essential environmental feature to prevent heat illnesses and skin cancer. A research team led by Klein Buendel has published a description of municipal shade policies in Frontiers in Public Health. Written policies related to shade from municipalities in four southwest and four northeast U.S. states were collected and analyzed.

Municipal codes, planning documents, and manuals/guidelines from 48 municipalities in eight U.S. states were coded for content related to shade by research assistants. A standardized protocol was used to assign numeric codes to each document to assess type of document, type of shade, location, resource allocation, accountability, and design standards. Results were summarized using descriptive statistics.

Three-quarters of municipalities (75.0%) had a policy document that addressed shade, including municipal codes (54.2%), planning documents (29.2%), and manuals/guidelines (12.5%). Protecting from heat (31.3%) was mentioned in policies more than protecting from ultraviolet radiation (8.3%), as was natural shade (56.3%) rather than constructed shade (25.0%). Policies prescribed several design standards, most frequently shade material, proportion of area covered, and attractiveness. Half (50.0%) of municipalities mentioned accountability for shade in the policy, but only a third (35.4%) addressed resource allocation. Regional differences were seen in policy document type, shade type, locations, design standards, and resource allocation.

Many municipalities had policies that mentioned shade, but only a minority of policies indicated that the purpose of the policy was protection from heat or ultraviolet radiation. In northeast municipalities, which can have local home rule traditions, policies on shade appeared almost entirely in municipal codes. Southwest municipalities often included policies in planning documents that may have less legal force than municipal codes.

This research was funded by Klein Buendel and a grant from the National Cancer Institute to the Rutgers Cancer Institute at Rutgers University (CA072720; Dr. Steven Libutti, Principal Investigator). Authors include Phoebe Grutter from Science Park High School, Dr. Margaret Morrissey-Basler from Providence College, Dr. Ian Buller from DLH, Dr. Carolyn Heckman from Rutgers University, and Alishia Kinsey, Taylor Sullivan, and Dr. David Buller from Klein Buendel.